It is an act upon sin itself, and not immediately upon the sinner. For by “the blood of bulls and goats,” he intends all the sacrifices of the law. Hence in any of the dispensations that God has placed among men, all who will do whatever they are told to do, will be forgiven on the strength of the blood of Christ. 1896. The sincere offerers of these victims under the law did indeed receive forgiveness; but it was by virtue of the atonement of Christ, which the Jewish sacrifices prefigured. 1871-8. Were Paul to write an epistle to many disciples and others today, he would use the same argument about baptism and the other items of service to Christ, He would say that it is impossible for baptism and the other formalities of the Gospel to take away sin. 3. "Commentary on Hebrews 10:4". The fact is, that the blood of the bullock or of the goat (the sin offering on the Day of Atonement) could not weigh against the guilt of a nation, or even of a single worshipper. They are in their own nature mortal; man is immortal; and surely the sacrifice of their temporal, yea, short lives, could be no adequate price for men’s everlasting lives. 1909-1922. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/bnb/hebrews-10.html. The modification of this negative proposition; “it was impossible they should do so.”. Id sanguis Christi facit, tum quia fidem in nobis parit, tum quia Christo jus dat nobis auxilia necessaria impetrandi. "Cleansed," therefore, refers not at all to something done to the person of the worshiper, but to his sins, having been once for all removed or taken away. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/tbi/hebrews-10.html. For as unto the law, he answers two things: 1. 27:9). "Commentary on Hebrews 10:4". For God appointed no sacrifices until after the promise of sending the Seed of the woman to break the head of the serpent. Had such sacrifices been sufficient, the Son of God would not have suffered, the just for the unjust, that He might bring sinners to God. By what way, and on what consideration they were means to deter men from sin, I have newly declared. He therefore justly takes away from it the power of cleansing. The blood of brutes could not take away the sin of man. But because the once for all putting away of sin forever from God's sight (see Ch. 9:2). It results from His infinite wisdom that the means which He employs are exactly adapted to the object He has in view, neither greater nor less. 1862. The blood of bulls and goats, as offered in sacrifice, and carried into the most holy place, was designed of God to represent the way of taking away sin, but not by itself to effect it; and it was therefore impossible that so it should do. But there could be no such thing between the demerit of sin and the affront put on the righteousness of God on the one hand, and a reparation by the blood of bulls and goats on the other. The annual sacrifice was only a shadow and prophecy of another sacrifice, in which the Divine will was to be perfectly accomplished. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/acc/hebrews-10.html. BibliographySchaff, Philip. Hebrews 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him. Now, for fifteen hundred years, the blood of bulls and goats flowed on His altar, and their constant repetition proved their inefficacy. Every Christian uncertain whether all his sins have been put away forever, needs to look to God's words about the Cross and the death of Christ, not to His priestly work on high. (2.) The mortgage on your soul has been paid off: "One sacrifice for sins forever"! "Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible". "Schaff's Popular Commentary on the New Testament". BibliographyExell, Joseph S. "Commentary on "Hebrews 10:4". "I, even I, am He that blotteth out thy transgressions for Mine own sake: and I will not remember thy sins" (Isa. BibliographyRobertson, A.T. "Commentary on Hebrews 10:4". It was not that they should be arguments to turn them from sin unto newness of life, so as they should sin no more. Perhaps someone replies that it does not say they were to be forgiven then. that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins; "Commentary on Hebrews 10:4". They were not of sufficient value to make satisfaction for the affronts done to the justice and government of God. For, 1st, These sacrifices could not fully manifest the great evil of sin, and its destructive nature. Greek Testament Critical Exegetical Commentary. For if there be no more in sin and the guilt of it but what may be expiated and taken away at so low a price, but what may have atonement made for it by the blood of beasts, why should they not give satisfaction unto their lusts by living in sin? (Matthew Henry.). Isa. What is denied concerning it; “it could not take away sins.”, 4. Wherefore the church knowing that these sacrifices did call sin to remembrance, representing the displeasure of God against it, which was their first end; and that although there was an intimation of grace and mercy in them, by the commutation and substitution which they allowed, yet that they could not of themselves take away sin; it made them the more earnestly, and with longing desires, look after him and his sacrifice who should perfectly take away sin and make peace with God; wherein the principal exercise of grace under the old testament did consist. that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins; which was shed on the day of atonement: sin is a breach of the moral law, but these sacrifices belong to, the ceremonial law, which are less acceptable to God than moral duties; sin is committed against God, and has an objective infiniteness in it, and therefore can never be atoned for by the blood of such creatures; it leaves a stain on the mind and conscience, which this blood cannot reach; besides, this is not the same blood, nor of the same kind with the person that has sinned; yea, if this could take away sin, it would do more than the blood of the man himself could do; such blood shed can never answer the penalty of the law, satisfy divine justice, or secure the honour of divine holiness: but what the blood of these creatures could not do, the blood of Christ has done, and does: that takes away sin from the sight of justice, and from the consciences of the saints. Hebrews 10:4. ἀφαιρεῖν, to take away) περιελεῖν,(58) to remove entirely; Hebrews 10:11. BibliographyEdwards, Justin. For the object of ἀφαιρεῖν, that which it is exercised about, is ἁμαρτία. BibliographyTorrey, R. A. — And it belongs unto the wisdom of faith to use them unto their proper end, not to trust unto them as unto what they cannot of themselves effect. That which is denied of these sacrifices, namely, the taking away of sins: To take away sin, is to make atonement for sin, to expiate the guilt of it before God, by a satisfaction given, or price paid, that it shall never bind over the penitent sinner unto punishment. It was utterly impossible that sin should be taken away before God, and from the conscience of the sinner, but by the blood of Christ. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats.
2004 Honda Vfr 800 Top Speed, Italian Imperative With Pronouns Exercises, Where Can I Buy Scottish Meat Pies Near Me, Makita Cordless Sander Parts, Salted Caramel Ganache, Hillshire Farm Beef Lit'l Smokies Recipes, Burning Bush Story,